Back to school
by Dennis Sowards
May 1, 2009
Everyone needs to be included in lean-education
efforts
In a March article, we discussed the importance
of creating a “lean” company and not just implementing a few “lean” tools.
Having
figured out who will lead your efforts, one of the next critical questions to
answer is: How will you educate everyone?
Skilled and
engaged employees are critical to maintaining a competitive advantage in today’s
tough market. Your employees are still the only resource you really have that
your competition can’t duplicate. They may steal your employees from you, but
they can’t clone them.
Consider the following principles as
a foundation for answering this question in a lean way.
Remember
that everyone is part of the company and all need to be educated about lean.
This may sound too simplistic, but often in construction
not all employees are considered with the same priority. Sometimes only
managers and supervisors are involved in learning sessions.
Frontline
workers who do the install work may be excluded from any learning based on the
false assumption that they are only there for the project and have little
loyalty to the company.
Travelers are often treated as
second-class employees. If an employee is doing work — install, shop, delivery,
office, etc. — that employee needs to know about lean and why it is important
to apply it.
While every employee needs to learn about lean,
everyone does not need the same training at the same time.
Some
may need to learn a little about lean, and then through on-the-job training
learn how to apply the tools. Another employee may need to learn only one or
two tools while others will learn many. The issue is not whom to educate but
how much each should have and when.
Any education is most
effective when applied soon after the learning experience.
Lean
is no different. Teaching a tool that the employee will not use for years is of
little value. Whatever the learning system used, it must include opportunities
to try it.
When managers consider doing training, they often
look at the costs.
Training is an investment — not an expense.
There is a great difference in the two and how participants and sponsors
perceive them. If one looks at the cost of education one must also consider the
cost of not training, including the cost of learning by error and
mistakes.
What should one include in lean education? There
needs to be more than an introduction to some tools. Employees need to
understand why doing it is important and some basic principles, including:
•
Value, as seen by the customer, and waste.
• The meaning of
the value stream
• Why we want flow, and to avoid batch
thinking
• How pull works
• Continuous
improvement.
Tools that are most useful in construction to
be taught include the Five S, the Lean Construction Institute’s Last Planner
System, “Kaizen” events, value-stream analysis, quick-changeover techniques,
“Kanban,” “spaghetti charts,” “muda walks,” rules of release, visual control
techniques, and “Poka-Yoke.” See sidebar for definitions.
Besides
lean principles and tools, there are some other areas relevant for employees to
learn. One is problem solving. While most employees know how to solve problems
— or they would probably not have a job — most do not know root-cause analysis
and often solve symptoms, not causes.
Engaged workers
Another area is the importance of having engaged
employees involved in improving processes and serving customers. Many tools
will fail if the employees don’t want to apply them. Managers need to
understand the importance of and how to keep employees
engaged. In designing the learning system for
implementation, a good approach is for all employees to receive the same
training. Many companies do this by running all employees through the same
workshop or seminar. This gets everyone started on the same plane and does not
discriminate by rank or type of work. In fact, it usually makes for a rich
discussion in sessions that have a mixture of management, non-management,
field, shop and support functions. A skilled trainer or lean consultant who
understands the construction industry usually teaches the sessions. A
better investment of resources for educating employees on lean is to identify
various groups of employees and target based on the needs of each group. A
training matrix (see chart) often represents this approach. While
it takes more time to identify the needs of each group, it also pays dividends
in making the learning experiences more meaningful to each participant.
External experts or lean champions usually teach the sessions with the
company. The best approach is to build on the training
matrix discussed previously and have most of the sessions taught by senior
managers and experienced project managers. While it is easier to bring in a
lean expert, having those who lead the company teach is much more
effective. This approach includes periodic assessment of the
educational progress. Refresher courses may be taught annually. Besides
educating company employees at some point, the leaders will need to determine
how to educate new employees as well as suppliers and subcontractors. In some
cases, a supplier may already be involved in lean techniques and can assist in
developing and delivering training. Involving subcontractors
early in the sessions can provide synergism for current or future projects.
This is especially true in applying the Last Planner System (see chart) for a
specific project. Having the project manager, all trades and subcontractors —
even the owner’s construction manager or representative — learn how to apply
the system can do much of what a partnering session does to create
teamwork. To just teach a few people or just a few tools
will lead to limited success. The companies who are serious about becoming lean
educate their employees in a systematic way to create lean thinkers, not
robots. Dennis Sowards is an industry consultant and author
of the research book Thinking Lean — Tools for Decreasing Costs and Increasing
Profits, funded and published by the Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning
Contractors’ National Association-affiliated New Horizons Foundation. His
company is Quality Support Services Inc. and he can be reached at
dennis@YourQSS.com or at (480) 835-1185.
Definitions
Five S: The Five S system came from automaker
Toyota. They are used to organize and visually control the workplace to
eliminate waste. They stand for: sorting, simplifying, sweeping, standardizing
and self-discipline. They eliminate many “treasure hunts” common to construction. Kaizen
event: A quick-hit method for lean process improvement, typically consisting of
several days of intense training combined with immediate application of the
concepts just taught to identify and eliminate waste. It takes place at the
production work location. Kanban: Japanese term meaning “a
signboard.” A communication tool used in just-in-time production systems. The
signal tells workers to pull parts or refill material to a certain quantity
used in production. Muda walk: “Muda” means waste and there
are seven basic types of waste in doing work. A muda walk is where an observer,
usually management, invests the time to go to the work area and look for waste.
This differs from “management by walking around” (MBWA) because the observer
would typically invest an hour or more observing just one area or function.
MBWA is usually a quick walk through the entire operation. Detailed observation
yields many improvement opportunities. Poka-Yoke: A
mistake-proofing method or device developed by Shigeo Shingo that is used to
prevent an error or defect from happening or being passed on to the next
operation. Spaghetti chart: A physical map of the work area
that shows the path taken by the specific product or a person being observed. A
line is drawn from start to end indicating the path moved by the product or
person. Value-stream analysis: An evaluation of all the
processes and activities used to design, produce and deliver the product or
service to the customer. Each step is categorized into value added, non-valued
added but necessary, or non-value-added and not necessary. Improvements are
made by eliminating or changing any non-value-added activities.
|