Making sense of the eco-building movement
by Jim Olsztynski
January 1, 2009
Consumer
interest is conspiring with government initiatives to spark the green building
movement as the most exciting trend now touching the HVAC industry.
Not a month goes by when this magazine doesn’t report significant new
developments involving the industry’s contributions toward a more sustainable
environment.
Here’s a quick summary of some of the notable green news stories of 2008:
• The National Association of Home Builders unveiled a national green building
standard, developed in conjunction with the International Code Council.
• A study from the American Institute of Architects found that more than 25 percent
of the U.S. population now lives in counties with green building programs in
place, while 14 percent of U.S. cities with populations of more than 50,000
have green building programs. Many more will likely soon follow.<br><br>
• The IAPMO Green Technical Committee is charged with a directive from the
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials’ board of
directors to mandate a minimum 10 percent reduction in energy and water use
over the next three years via code changes that require sustainable
construction practices.
• The International Code Council announced in July the formation of its own
Sustainable Building Technology Committee.
• Australia’s GreenPlumbers program spawned an offshoot titled GreenPlumbers USA.
The organization offers accredited workshops around the country, training
plumbers in water conservation and climate care.
This is just a small sampling of activities taking place around our industry
with the noble goal of helping all of us to live better, cleaner lives. Is it
possible to find something disagreeable in all this?
Green is not always rosy
Well,
this curmudgeon finds a few things not quite right with the eco-frenzy, and I’m
not alone. For one thing, confusion reigns with some 60 green rating systems in
the country. Some are product-focused, like the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s Energy Star and WaterSense programs, while others take a complex,
systematic approach, like the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design program and the home builders’ green building
initiative.
In between are various other initiatives sparked by government agencies, trade
associations, affinity groups and so on.
With so many groups staking out shades of green, turf battles are heating up
and the green movement sometimes feels more about the color of currency than
ecology. Inevitably, some green initiatives clash with economic interests. A
prime example is the attempt by code and standard bodies to restrict the number
of permissible showerheads, while their manufacturers and distributors
naturally want to sell as many as possible.
Then there’s “green washing,” a term coined as a takeoff on “brainwashing” to
describe everyone jumping on the green bandwagon with or without a ticket. With
scores of standards to choose from, manufacturers can pick around until they
find at least one that enables them to slap a green label on almost any
product, even though some have as much environmental impact as a window fan blowing
against a hurricane.
‘Code wars’
Moreover,
the “code wars” fought over various materials for decades have their
counterpart in the green era. Too many press releases trumpeting green products
use as much space disparaging the green credentials of rival products as they
do promoting their own features and benefits.
Cohesion is needed — otherwise the proliferation of green standards threatens
to impede progress toward truly sustainable buildings. Witness the gridlock
over reconstruction of New York’s World Trade Center site, thanks to the clash
of interests among dozens of government agencies and private organizations.
I’m being realistic more than critical in pointing out these conflicts within
the industry’s green movement. The fact remains many industry players are ahead
of the curve and taking leadership roles in promoting a greener environment.
They are producing, distributing and installing materials that common sense —
if not some certifying body — tells us contribute to a more sustainable
environment. They are aided in no small part by skyrocketing prices that make
it imperative to satisfy public demand for products that reduce energy and
water consumption.
Many companies also are implementing sustainable practices throughout their own
manufacturing, distribution and construction processes. Keep up, and step up,
the good work.
Jim Olsztynski — pronounced Ol-stin-skee — is editor of Supply House Times, a
sister publication of Snips. He can be reached at (630) 694-4006, or e-mail
wrdwzrd@aol.com.
|